Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen T-Roc engine produces 73 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 166 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen T-Roc could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1237 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has 3 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Roc (by 18 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Volkswagen T-Roc can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 130 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |