Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen T-Roc engine produces 73 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 166 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen T-Roc could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1237 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has 3 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Roc (by 18 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Volkswagen T-Roc can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 130 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |