Volkswagen T-Roc 2017 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen T-Roc engine produces 35 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen T-Roc reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen T-Roc over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen T-Roc consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Tiguan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is smaller. Volkswagen T-Roc is 26 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen T-Roc is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1290 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Volkswagen T-Roc has 170 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 365 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Roc is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Volkswagen T-Roc can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`780 kg | 2`170 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`222 kg | 1`495 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 558 kg | 675 kg | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Therefore, Volkswagen Tiguan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Roc has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |