Volkswagen T-Cross 2023 vs Ford EcoSport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Cross is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen T-Cross engine produces 25 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Volkswagen T-Cross reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.8 | |
| Volkswagen T-Cross consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen T-Cross could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.13 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.65 m | |
| Volkswagen T-Cross is 3 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen T-Cross is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1281 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Cross has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen T-Cross has 145 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Cross (by 43 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen T-Cross is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`800 kg | 1`775 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`326 kg | 1`249 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 474 kg | 526 kg | |
| Volkswagen T-Cross load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Ford EcoSport. Therefore, Ford EcoSport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen T-Cross has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |
