Volkswagen Routan 2008 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volkswagen Routan is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Sharan has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 4.0 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 - 283 HP | 140 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 - 360 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 - 11.9 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Volkswagen Routan petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volkswagen Routan is larger. Volkswagen Routan is 29 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Routan is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Routan is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Routan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`038 | ~ 2`337 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Routan has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |