Volkswagen Phaeton 2010 vs Jaguar XJ 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Phaeton engine produces 35 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Jaguar XJ. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.2 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Phaeton consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Phaeton could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Volkswagen Phaeton is 19 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 520 litres | |
| Volkswagen Phaeton has 20 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJ. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Phaeton is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Volkswagen Phaeton can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`760 | 2`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Phaeton has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |