Volkswagen Phaeton 2010 vs Jaguar XF 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Phaeton engine produces 60 HP more power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Jaguar XF. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Phaeton reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Phaeton consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Phaeton could require 630 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Phaeton consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1530 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1730 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 118 mm (4.6 inches) | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | |
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volkswagen Phaeton is 11 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volkswagen Phaeton uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Phaeton is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Volkswagen Phaeton can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`760 kg | 2`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`261 kg | 1`659 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 499 kg | 591 kg | |
| Volkswagen Phaeton load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Jaguar XF. Therefore, Jaguar XF is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Phaeton has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |