Volkswagen Passat CC 2008 vs Volvo S60 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 3 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S60. Despite less power, Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A3, Volkswagen Beetle, Audi TT | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo XC60, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Passat CC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Passat CC engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC is 17 cm longer than the Volvo S60, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Passat CC is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 380 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Passat CC has 152 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat CC is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo S60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |