Volkswagen Passat CC 2008 vs Volvo S60 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 23 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 1140 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC 2008 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Passat CC 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC is 17 cm longer than the Volvo S60, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Passat CC is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 380 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Passat CC has 152 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat CC is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo S60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |