Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volvo S80 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 34 HP more power than Volvo S80, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.9 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat CC could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.49 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 52 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |