Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volvo S80 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 50 NM less than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
1420 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
980 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | no data | 4.85 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.86 m | |
Height: | no data | 1.49 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 480 litres | |
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 52 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 18 000 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |