Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volvo S80 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 34 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 1070 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | 148 mm (5.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo S80 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo S80 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Volvo S80 2009 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is smaller. Volkswagen Passat CC is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Passat CC is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat CC is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S80. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`970 kg | 2`150 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`507 kg | 1`647 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 463 kg | 503 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |