Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volvo S60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volkswagen Passat CC) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volvo S60) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 75 HP less power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.48 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 152 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |