Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volkswagen Passat CC) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volkswagen Polo) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 65 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 197 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.0 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.47 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 72 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |