Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volvo S90 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 65 HP less power than Volvo S90, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Volvo S90. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat CC could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Passat CC engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Passat CC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Passat CC engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.44 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 32 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S90. The Volvo S90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 250 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |