Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volkswagen Passat 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat CC could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Passat might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Passat 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Passat 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is larger, but lower. Volkswagen Passat CC is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat CC is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volkswagen Passat CC uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`970 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`507 kg | 1`560 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 463 kg | 570 kg | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Volkswagen Passat. Therefore, Volkswagen Passat is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |