Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volkswagen Passat CC) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Skoda Superb) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 18 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 595 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Volkswagen Passat CC has 63 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`059 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 200 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |