Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Peugeot 301 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 92 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 78 HP more power than Peugeot 301, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Peugeot 301. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.3 | |
The Peugeot 301 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 301, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat CC could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
1420 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | no data | 4.44 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.75 m | |
Height: | no data | 1.47 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 506 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 26 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 301. The Peugeot 301 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`549 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 15 200 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Peugeot 301 has
| |