Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Peugeot 301 2013

 
Volkswagen Passat CC
2012 -
Peugeot 301
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 170 HP92 HP
Torque: 350 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds11.2 seconds
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 78 HP more power than Peugeot 301, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Peugeot 301. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.54.3
The Peugeot 301 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 301, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat CC could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1270 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1280 km on highway
Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: no data4.44 m
Width: no data1.75 m
Height: no data1.47 m
Trunk capacity: 532 litres506 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1332 litres
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 26 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 301. The Peugeot 301 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): 1`9701`549
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 15 2004000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat CC has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Peugeot 301 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv