Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Dacia Logan 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 80 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat CC could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Passat CC engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.52 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 22 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Logan. The Dacia Logan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Dacia Logan has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Passat CC, so Dacia Logan quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |