Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Citroen C-Elysee 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 71 HP more power than Citroen C-Elysee, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Citroen C-Elysee. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C-Elysee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Elysee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat CC could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Elysee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1310 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Passat CC engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C-Elysee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.47 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 506 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 26 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C-Elysee. The Citroen C-Elysee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Citroen C-Elysee has
| |