Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Ford Mondeo 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 61 HP more power than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.2 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.48 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 429 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 103 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The Ford Mondeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |