Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Kia Optima 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 45 HP more power than Kia Optima. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.6 | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Passat CC could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 27 litres more trunk space than the Kia Optima. The Kia Optima may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Kia Optima has
| |