Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Chrysler 200 2015

 
Volkswagen Passat CC
2012 -
Chrysler 200
2015 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol3.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 210 HP294 HP
Torque: n/a NM355 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 secondsn/a seconds
Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 84 HP less power than Chrysler 200.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.810.2
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 890 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway780 km on highway
Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Chrysler 200 2015 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles. After ...  More about Chrysler 200 2015 3.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: no data4.89 m
Width: no data1.87 m
Height: no data1.49 m
Trunk capacity: 532 litres453 litres
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 79 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. The Chrysler 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no data12.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9902`092
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 15 40010 200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat CC has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Chrysler 200 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv