Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Chrysler 200 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 35 HP more power than Chrysler 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 9.8 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.48 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 142 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. The Chrysler 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |