Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Chrysler 200 2010

 
Volkswagen Passat CC
2012 - 2015
Chrysler 200
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 210 HP175 HP
Torque: 280 NM225 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 secondsn/a seconds
Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 35 HP more power than Chrysler 200, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Chrysler 200.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.89.8
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 890 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway820 km on highway
Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.87 m
Width: 1.86 m1.84 m
Height: 1.42 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Passat CC is 7 cm shorter than the Chrysler 200, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat CC is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 532 litres390 litres
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 142 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. The Chrysler 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat CC is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler 200.
Gross weight (kg): 1`990no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 15 2004000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat CC has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Chrysler 200 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv