Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 210 HP | 197 HP | |
Torque: | n/a NM | 259 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 13 HP more power than Chevrolet Malibu. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.8 | |
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 73 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | no data | 4.86 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.85 m | |
Height: | no data | 1.46 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 461 litres | |
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 71 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. The Chevrolet Malibu may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 15 200 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |