Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 43 HP more power than Chevrolet Malibu. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.47 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 545 litres | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC has 13 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`539 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |