Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volvo S80 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 51 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo S80. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.4 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.49 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 52 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |