Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volvo S80 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.49 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 52 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |