Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volvo S60 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 152 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 51 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.3 | |
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | no data | 4.63 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.87 m | |
Height: | no data | 1.48 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 380 litres | |
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 152 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`040 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 15 400 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |