Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volvo S60 2010

 
Volkswagen Passat CC
2012 -
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 152 HP203 HP
Torque: 250 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds7.7 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Passat CC engine produces 51 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Passat CC reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.48.3
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Passat CC consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Passat CC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1030 km on highway
Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: no data4.63 m
Width: no data1.87 m
Height: no data1.48 m
Trunk capacity: 532 litres380 litres
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 152 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no data11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9502`040
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

average
Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 18 0007400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Passat CC has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv