Volkswagen Passat CC 2008 vs Skoda Superb 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.6 | 1.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 300 HP | 105 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 440 NM | 200 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 - 9.8 seconds | 6.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 10.1 | 5.7 - 7.6 | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Superb. On average, Volkswagen Passat CC equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volkswagen Passat CC is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Passat CC is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Volkswagen Passat CC has 33 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Passat CC is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Volkswagen Passat CC can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`981 | ~ 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |