Volkswagen Passat CC 2012 vs Volvo S60 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.6 | 1.6 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 - 300 HP | 115 - 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 350 NM | 240 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 - 8.6 seconds | 6.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.3 | 4.3 - 9.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Volkswagen Passat CC equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.48 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 380 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Passat CC has 152 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`089 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Passat CC has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |