Volkswagen Jetta 1986 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Jetta engine produces 43 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Jetta reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Jetta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Jetta consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Jetta over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Jetta consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Jetta) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volkswagen Jetta is smaller. Volkswagen Jetta is 42 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Jetta is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
905 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Jetta is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volkswagen Jetta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Jetta has
|
Opel Omega has
| |