Volkswagen Jetta 2006 vs Mercedes C class 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 155 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Jetta engine produces 27 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Jetta reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 8.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Jetta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Jetta consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Jetta over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Jetta consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Jetta gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Jetta) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes C class engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Volkswagen Jetta 2006 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine often report difficulties starting in cold weather. Carbon buildup tends to cause sticking in the intake valves, throttle body, and EGR valve, leading to performance ... More about Volkswagen Jetta 2006 1.6 engine Mercedes C klase 2004 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes C klase 2004 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.55 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
Volkswagen Jetta is larger. Volkswagen Jetta is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Jetta is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Jetta is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Jetta has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |