Volkswagen Jetta 2011 vs Honda Civic 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Volkswagen Jetta is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Jetta engine produces 18 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 25 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite less power, Volkswagen Jetta reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Jetta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Jetta consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Jetta over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Jetta consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
770 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Jetta gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Yeti | Used also on Honda FR-V | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Jetta might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Volkswagen Jetta engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Volkswagen Jetta 2011 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. Honda Civic 2012 1.8 engine: The engine is demanding on the quality of petrol and oil used. Use of poor quality fuel can lead to repairs of the lambda sensor and catalytic converter. The chain tensioner and the engine cushions have a ... More about Honda Civic 2012 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
Volkswagen Jetta is larger. Volkswagen Jetta is 10 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Jetta is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 440 litres | |
Volkswagen Jetta has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Jetta has 70 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.56 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Jetta is 0.46 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Volkswagen Jetta can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
The Honda Civic scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 5600 | 7000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Jetta has
|
Honda Civic has
| |