Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 vs Toyota Verso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan engine produces 24 HP more power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Verso. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.62 m | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 12 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1740 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has 16 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Verso. The Toyota Verso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Verso has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |