Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan engine produces 8 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.86 m | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3200 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage space. Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 2`159 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Caddy is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Caddy has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |