Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 vs Renault Scenic 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan and Renault Scenic have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan torque is 10 NM less than Renault Scenic. Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is smaller. Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1520 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 350 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`830 kg | 1`967 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`420 kg | 1`460 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 410 kg | 507 kg | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Renault Scenic. Therefore, Renault Scenic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |