Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 vs Renault Kangoo 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan engine produces 24 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.80 m | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 13 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1520 litres | 2600 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 1080 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`830 kg | 1`954 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`420 kg | 1`320 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 410 kg | 634 kg | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 55 procentiem less than Renault Kangoo. Therefore, Renault Kangoo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |