Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 vs BMW 2 series 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW 2 series is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan engine produces 80 HP less power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 150 NM less than BMW 2 series. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW 2 sērija 2018: This generation BMW features the Haldex Generation V proactive all-wheel-drive system, which sends 100% of torque to the front wheels as standard. The system analyzes data from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement if required. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split equally between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
| BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 2 cm shorter than the BMW 2 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1905 litres | |
|
BMW 2 series has more luggage space. Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has 145 litres less trunk space than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series, which means Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 2 series scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 2 series has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |