Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011

 
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan
2014 -
Volkswagen Tiguan
2011 - 2015
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 86 HP122 HP
Torque: 160 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds10.9 seconds
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan engine produces 36 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.96.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1020 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1160 km on highway
790 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia, Volkswagen Caddy, Audi A1Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Yeti
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Tiguan might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.43 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.58 m1.70 m
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is smaller.
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 9 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 13 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1510 litres
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has 30 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The Volkswagen Tiguan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8402`080
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

low
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 215 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12 00011 200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Tiguan has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv