Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 vs Toyota Verso 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 86 HP | 132 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Toyota Verso is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan engine produces 46 HP less power than Toyota Verso, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
1190 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
790 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Caddy, Skoda Fabia, Audi A1 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifespan is relatively low. There tends to be increased vibration at idling speed. Problems with the fuel pressure pump may be the first sign of a petrol smell in the oil. ... More about Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.2 engine Toyota Verso 2013 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine most frequently report excessive oil consumption. The timing chain has a relatively short lifespan, with many owners needing to replace it between 150,000 and 200,000 km. ... More about Toyota Verso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.58 m | 1.62 m | |
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 12 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 4 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 178 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 178 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | 484 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1696 litres | |
In 5-seat version Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage space (by 16 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 2`125 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | average | |
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Verso has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |