Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 vs Toyota Verso 2013

 
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan
2014 -
Toyota Verso
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 86 HP132 HP
Torque: 160 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds11.7 seconds
Toyota Verso is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan engine produces 46 HP less power than Toyota Verso, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.96.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1020 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1070 km on highway
790 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Caddy, Skoda Fabia, Audi A1Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifespan is relatively low. There tends to be increased vibration at idling speed. Problems with the fuel pressure pump may be the first sign of a petrol smell in the oil. ...  More about Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 1.2 engine 

Toyota Verso 2013 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine most frequently report excessive oil consumption. The timing chain has a relatively short lifespan, with many owners needing to replace it between 150,000 and 200,000 km. ...  More about Toyota Verso 2013 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.46 m
Width: 1.81 m1.79 m
Height: 1.58 m1.62 m
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 12 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 4 cm lower.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: 500 litres178 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data178 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 500 litres484 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1696 litres
In 5-seat version Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage space (by 16 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8402`125
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Verso has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10 2007800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Toyota Verso has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv