Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is available only with front wheel drive, while Renault Kadjar can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 150 HP | 110 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 320 NM | 205 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 13.2 seconds | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 5.5 | 3.8 - 5.6 | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Kadjar. On average, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is smaller. Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 11 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has 28 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`896 | ~ 1`935 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |