Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Plus is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf Plus engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf Plus reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Golf Plus consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf Plus could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Golf Plus consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford C-Max engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Golf Plus engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 2.0 engine: 2.0 FSI engine, part of the EA827 family, features a lightweight aluminum block with cast-iron liners and a unique timing system. A toothed belt drives the exhaust camshaft, while the intake camshaft is driven by a single-row chain, which also integrates with the variable valve timing mechanism. The timing regulator is ... More about Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Plus is smaller. Volkswagen Golf Plus is 12 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf Plus is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 395 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Volkswagen Golf Plus has 155 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf Plus is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 4.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf Plus has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |