Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 vs Ford C-Max 2010

 
Volkswagen Golf Plus
2009 -
Ford C-Max
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 105 HP105 HP
Torque: 175 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds12.6 seconds
Volkswagen Golf Plus is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Golf Plus and Ford C-Max have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Golf Plus torque is 25 NM more than Ford C-Max. Volkswagen Golf Plus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.56.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf Plus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf Plus consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf Plus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf Plus consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1030 km on highway
800 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf Plus gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford C-Max engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea, Skoda YetiInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Fiesta, Ford B-Max
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf Plus might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Volkswagen Golf Plus engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive.

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.38 m
Width: 1.76 m1.83 m
Height: 1.59 m1.63 m
Volkswagen Golf Plus is smaller.
Volkswagen Golf Plus is 18 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf Plus is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 395 litres432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1684 litres
Ford C-Max has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Golf Plus has 37 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf Plus is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8801`860
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Volkswagen Golf Plus has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Plus, so Volkswagen Golf Plus quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 56005000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf Plus has
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Ford C-Max has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv