Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 - 160 HP | 90 - 137 HP | |
Torque: | 132 - 320 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14.9 seconds | 10.8 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.6 | 4.9 - 8.7 | |
Volkswagen Golf Plus petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Volkswagen Golf Plus equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.59 m | 1.64 m | |
Volkswagen Golf Plus is 8 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Golf Plus is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 395 litres | 550 litres | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Volkswagen Golf Plus has 155 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf Plus is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Volkswagen Golf Plus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`984 | ~ 1`267 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | below average | |
Average price (€): | 5600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf Plus has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |