Volkswagen Fox 2005 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Fox and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Fox reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Fox could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.47 m | |
| Volkswagen Fox is 9 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Fox is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1016 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Fox is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Fox can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`570 kg | 1`650 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`085 kg | 1`095 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 485 kg | 555 kg | |
| Volkswagen Fox load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Volkswagen Polo. Therefore, Volkswagen Polo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Fox has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |