Volkswagen Fox 2005 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Fox engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Fox reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Fox could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Volkswagen Fox is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Fox is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Fox is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1016 litres | 787 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Fox has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 229 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Fox is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Volkswagen Fox can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Fox has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |