Volkswagen Fox 2005 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005

Volkswagen Fox
2005 - 2011
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2006
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Body: HatchbackHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 124 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds12.9 seconds
Volkswagen Fox and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Fox torque is 2 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Volkswagen Fox reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.
Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.1 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Fox could require 45 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
650 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Length: 3.83 m3.92 m
Width: 1.66 m1.65 m
Height: 1.54 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Fox is 9 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Fox is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres270 litres
Volkswagen Fox has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Fox is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Fox can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5201`000
Safety: no data

below average
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 22002000
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Contact us: [email protected]