Volkswagen Fox 2005 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2001

Volkswagen Fox
2005 - 2011
Volkswagen Lupo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol


Power: 75 HP60 HP
Torque: 124 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds14.3 seconds
Volkswagen Fox is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Fox engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Volkswagen Lupo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Fox reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Fox could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres34 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle540 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway690 km on highway
720 km with real consumption500 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank.


Length: 3.83 m3.53 m
Width: 1.66 m1.64 m
Height: 1.54 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Fox is larger.
Volkswagen Fox is 30 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Fox is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1016 litres830 litres
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Fox has 130 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 186 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Fox is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Volkswagen Fox can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5201`380
Quality:Volkswagen Fox has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Lupo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Fox quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 20001200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Fox has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Lupo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: