Volkswagen Fox 2005 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Fox and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Fox torque is 2 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Volkswagen Fox reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Fox could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.47 m | |
| Volkswagen Fox is 9 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Fox is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1016 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Volkswagen Fox has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Fox is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Fox can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Fox has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |