Volkswagen Fox 2005 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 16.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Fox engine produces 5 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Fox reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Fox could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Fox consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Volkswagen Fox is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Fox is 14 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Fox is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1016 litres | 952 litres | |
| Volkswagen Fox has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 64 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Fox has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |